Trending...
- Heritage At Manalapan - A New Luxury Single Family Home Community Coming Late 2025
- 2026 Oscars Betting Odds: One Battle After Another Favored for Best Picture
- Emeritus Addresses Hospital Bed Shortages with Smart Storage Solutions
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - ncarol.com -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on ncarol.com
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on ncarol.com
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on ncarol.com
- NorthSky Celebrates One-Year Anniversary
- Free At Last Bail Bonds Gives Back Through Major Holiday Food Distribution Efforts Across Metro Atlanta
- Discover Elevated Living - Preview the Stunning New Townhome Collection
- TownePlace Suites Prescott Valley, AZ Opens
- SIX7 Introduces Olfactory Neurodesign™ — The First Fragrance System Engineered to Influence Emotion, Memory, and Desire at the Neural Level
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on ncarol.com
- GetKuwa emerging as GCC's #1 trusted online supplement marketplace as shoppers across UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar & Oman seek authenticity
- Uk Financial Ltd Provides Investors Of Maya Preferred & Mayacat Instructions For Upcoming First Ever Listing Of Both Erc-3643 "SEC-Ready" Tokens
- Kaufman Development and Daniel Kaufman Ventures Announce Strategic Expansion Into Data Centers and AI Infrastructure Across the United States
- Urban Angeethi in Cary, NC Unveils Its Famous Butter Chicken & Tikka Masala
- Event Raises $83,000 for the HBA DOC Foundation's Workforce Development Programs
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on ncarol.com
- "Meet the Eatmons" Offer Financial Advice ahead of the Holidays
- CCHR: Study Finds Involuntary Commitment Fails to Prevent Suicide, Raises Risk
- Slotozilla's Q3 2025: SBC Lisbon Outcomes and Partnership Expansion
- Historic Announcement for the Global Car Rental Industry
- Siembra Brings 18 Latinx Artists Together in Brooklyn Exhibition
- Gramercy Tech Launches StoryStream
- Turbo vs. Experts: Tracking OddsTrader's AI Performance at the NFL's Midpoint
- Outreaching.io Appoints Rameez Ghayas Usmani as CEO, Recognized as Best HARO Link Building Expert in the United States
- Winzele: A Trusted Isolation Transformer Manufacturer
- Luxury Mediterranean Estate in Gotha Sells for $1.52 Million, Closing $45,000 Over Asking
- ZEELOOL's Black Friday Sale Starts Early with Up to 80% Off Frames
- UV Weathering Test Chamber vs Xenon Arc Test Chamber: What's the Right Solution for Your Products
- Emeritus Addresses Hospital Bed Shortages with Smart Storage Solutions
- Fulton County & Grow Your World Amplify Atlanta Youth Through the Youth Audio Collective
- 2026 Oscars Betting Odds: One Battle After Another Favored for Best Picture
- Allen Field Co., Inc. Components Selected for Esko ArtiosCAD 3D Component Library
- The International Window Coverings Expo Returns to Raleigh, NC April 21–23, 2026
- Thirteen Reasons Why Gyminny Kids Is San Diego's Best Gymnastics Gym
- Make Holiday Travel Easier with Carbon Fiber Belts from NoNickel
- Heritage At Manalapan - A New Luxury Single Family Home Community Coming Late 2025
