Trending...
- Global License Exclusive Secured for Emesyl OTC Nausea Relief, Expanding Multi-Product Growth Strategy for Caring Brands, Inc. (N A S D A Q: CABR)
- Scoop Social Co. Partners with Air Canada to Celebrate New Direct Flights to Milan with Custom Italian Piaggio Ape Gelato Carts
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - ncarol.com -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on ncarol.com
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on ncarol.com
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on ncarol.com
- Urban Bush Women Celebrates Bessie Award Nominations & Winter 2026 Touring
- Imagen Golf Launches "Precision Lessons" with Trackman iO in Newtown, PA
- New Report Reveals Surprising Trends in Illinois Airport Accidents
- PebblePad Acquires myday to Deliver Unified Digital Campus Experiences for Student Success
- Adam Clermont Releases New Book – Profit Before People: When Corporations Knew It Was Dangerous and Sold It Anyway
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on ncarol.com
- The Greene Fellowship Announces $100,000 in Support for Artists in CO and Western NC
- Dirty Heads, 311, Tropidelic, and The Movement to Headline Everwild Music Festival in 2026 with its largest lineup to date!
- The Stork Foundation Announces 2025 Year-End Impact and Grant Awards Amid Rising National Demand
- Stout Industrial Technology Appoints Paul Bonnett as Chief Executive Officer
- Revenue Optics Appoints Ljupco Icevski as Executive Advisor in Strategic Move to Accelerate Commercial Development
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on ncarol.com
- Canyons & Chefs Announces Revamped Homepage
- $140 to $145 Million in 2026 Projected and Profiled in New BD Deep Research Report on its Position in $57 Billion US Marine Industry; N Y S E: OTH
- Really Cool Music Releases Its Fourth Single - "So Many Lost Years"
- MGN Logistics Acquires Fast Service LLC, Fueling MyMGN Marketplace Expansion and Supercharging Expedited Coverage Nationwide
- The Wait is Over: Salida Wine Festival Announces Triumphant 2026 Return After Seven-Year Hiatus
- Graduates With $40K in Student Debt Are Buying Businesses Instead of Taking Entry-Level Jobs
- Tatt:Magic Unveils Breakthrough Tattoo Recovery System with Faster Recovery No Itch, for Vibrant ink
- Anne Seidman: Within the Lines
- How Democrats Made Healthcare More Expensive in 2026
- Inkdnylon Launches Bilingual Ask Inkdnylon Platform
- JS Gallery Brings Global Voices to LA Art Show 2026 with "OFF SCRIPT" Exhibition
- ANTOANETTA Partners With Zestacor Digital Marketing to Expand Online Presence for Handcrafted Luxury Jewelry
- FrostSkin Launches Kickstarter Campaign for Patent-Pending Instant-Chill Water Purification Bottle
- The New Monaco of the South (of Italy)
- Lick Personal Oils Introduces the Ultimate Valentine's Day Gift Collection for Romantic, Thoughtful Gifting
- Lacy Hendricks Earns Prestigious MPM® Designation from NARPM®
- Walmart $WMT and COSTCO.COM $COST Distribution as SonicShieldX™ Platform Sets the Stage for Accelerated Growth in 2026: AXIL Brands (N Y S E: AXIL)
- AI-Driven Drug Development with Publication of New Bioinformatics Whitepaper for BullFrog AI: $BFRG Strengthens Its Position in AI Drug Development
- IQSTEL Enters 2026 from a Position of Strength Following Transformational Year Marked by N A S D A Q Uplisting, Record Revenue and First-Ever
- Are You Hiring The Right Heater Repair Company in Philly?
