New AI Research Breakthrough Aims to Bring Rigor — and Fairness — to Jury Selection
ncarol.com/10322964

WILMINGTON, N.C. - ncarol.com -- WILMINGTON, N.C. —As public defenders and small litigation teams face increasing caseloads and limited access to analytical resources in an increasingly data driven world, a new artificial-intelligence research project is offering a data-driven alternative to some of the most intuition-driven aspects of trial practice, including jury selection and pre-trial strategy.

Developed by an interdisciplinary team of Silicon Valley AI researchers, professional jury consultants, and lawyers, the project introduces an interpretable AI system that brings data-driven analysis to jury selection and trial preparation. The research, published on arXiv,  will be presented in March 2026 at the ACM Symposium on Law and Computer Science at UC Berkeley.

Researchers built the system using responses from more than 400 mock jurors who reviewed the same case and rendered verdicts. The AI analyzes those responses to help predict how future jurors may decide and to show which themes or arguments tend to resonate with different groups of jurors.

More on ncarol.com

• Shipping Containers Are Powering the Next Generation of Bitcoin Mining Infrastructure
• Art is Unfurling in Hillsborough
• Hypnotherapy Finder Announces Official US Wide Launch After Successful Soft Launch
• Melzi Job Coach Launches on iOS and Android: A Privacy-First AI Career Engine Built for Execution
• Training Lofts Launches $1,099 Unlimited Training Membership Featuring Semi-Private Coaching, Nutrition Support, and Recovery Services

In controlled evaluations, the AI system outperformed experienced trial consultants who assessed the same juror profiles under identical informational constraints. Unlike traditional jury consulting, the system is designed to be transparent, allowing attorneys to see which juror responses and questions carry the greatest predictive value. Ashwin Murthy, a Silicon Valley–based AI engineer who led the research, said the tool is intended to support—not replace—human judgment, particularly for litigants who lack access to costly trial consulting services.

Beyond jury selection, the system can also be used for data-driven trial preparation, including testing which legal theories resonate with different juror groups, examining the reasoning patterns behind juror decisions, and estimating potential damages in civil cases to help attorneys refine trial strategy.

Trial consulting often costs tens of thousands of dollars per case, putting it out of reach for most public defenders, said Lisa Pyle, a former Bronx prosecutor with more than 22 years of experience. AI-based decision-support tools, she said, could give public-interest litigators access to data-driven insights that have traditionally been available only to well-funded parties.

More on ncarol.com

• American Properties Realty, Inc. Leadership Attends NAHB International Builders' Show in Florida
• DASH Carolina Agents Named to 2026 Triangle Real Producers Top 500
• $317M Revenue and a Clear Path to $1B: $IQST is Positioned for a Major Profitability Inflection
• ASI Hosts 2026 Executive Business Summit for Global Partner Community
• US Interest Rate Pivot: Hedge Funds Leverage Tickeron AI for 177% Annualized Return

Beyond litigation, the tool is currently used in law school settings for hands-on jury selection exercises, giving students an opportunity to evaluate juror questionnaires in a data driven manner.

The researchers are now seeking collaborations with litigators to test the system in real-world settings, with an emphasis on public-interest cases. See the original article at https://lawsonmediapub.com/blogs/news/acm-symposium-on-computer-science-and-law-features-ai-jury-selection-research