Trending...
- Larry R. Wasion Highlights Jump Gate I: Time Chair. The Opening Novel in His Expansive Science Fiction Series
- Homeowner Prep Announces Strategic Language Shift: Replacing "Renters" with "Future Homeowners" to Inspire Wealth-Building Mindsets
- LiposoMore™ Redefines Bioavailability: Joyful Nutritional Launches High-Performance Liposomal Vitamin C and Iron for the Global Supplement Market
Subjecting 100,000 Americans, including children, to electroshock (ECT) constitutes torture, given the risks associated with it, CCHR says.
LOS ANGELES - ncarol.com -- The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR), a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting human rights in the field of mental health, is raising alarm over the dangers associated with Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), commonly known as electroshock. The organization is once again advocating for a ban on this controversial practice, highlighting the potential risks, including memory loss and brain damage. Psychiatrists estimate 100,000 Americans are given ECT every year, but there are no formal records kept on its use, despite its inherent risks. Through Freedom of Information Act requests, CCHR has established that teenagers and children ages 5 or younger have also been exposed to it, constituting, as the United Nations says, an act of torture.
The renewed call for a ban comes in response to the first-ever international survey of people who have undergone ECT, conducted by a team of researchers including individuals from England, Northern Ireland, and the United States. The survey is also distinctive as it simultaneously includes input from relatives and friends of ECT recipients.
The research team, consisting of five co-researchers, three of whom have personally experienced ECT, has launched a comprehensive survey.[1]
Historically, ECT research has been criticized for relying heavily on the subjective opinions of prescribing psychiatrists, leading to generally favorable outcomes. However, smaller studies in the 1980s and 1990s, which directly asked ECT patients about their experiences, revealed less favorable outcomes, including rates of permanent memory loss.[2]
While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has permitted ECT devices to remain on the market, it also cautions that "Long-term safety and effectiveness of ECT treatment has not been demonstrated."[3] In 1976, the devices were grandfathered in, and subsequently, no clinical trials have proven their safety and efficacy.
More on ncarol.com
Lisa Morrison, a co-researcher based in Belfast, Ireland, expressed concern about the treatment's impact on memory, stating, "ECT has caused huge gaps in my memory. It's particularly distressing as a Mum to have lost significant memories of my children growing up…. The treatment can sometimes affect relatives too and their relationship with those receiving it. We want everybody to know their experiences matter."
CCHR played a pivotal role in securing the first legislative safeguards against ECT use, a landmark achievement dating back to the 1970s. The organization also contributed to the prohibition of electroshock therapy for minors in California and subsequently in various other states, including Texas and in Western Australia.
ECT sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure, which induces a loss of consciousness and violent muscle contractions, masked by an anesthetic.[4]
Recent guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Mental Health, Human Rights, and Legislation, also asserts that ECT can result in brain damage. This requirement is supported by information found in a manual from a U.S. electroshock device manufacturer, which confirms the occurrence of this adverse effect.[5]
The online, anonymous survey, approved by the University of East London Ethics Committee, is open to individuals worldwide who are at least 18 years old and have undergone ECT in the past, excluding the last four weeks.[6]
In the UK, it has been reported that around 40% of ECT procedures are non-consensual and performed on individuals detained against their will under the framework of the UK Mental Health Act.[7] In the United States, numerous states permit involuntary ECT, even though the United Nations Convention against Torture explicitly denounces such practices.[8]
In 2013 the UN Committee against Torture stated that when forcibly given or administered without a patient's consent, electroshock constitutes torture—a practice that needs to be outlawed.[9]
More on ncarol.com
So detrimental are its effects that CCHR produced a definitive documentary on electroshock, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock.
CCHR urges those who have undergone ECT or have close connections to ECT recipients to participate in the survey, emphasizing the importance of hearing the voices of those directly affected by this controversial treatment. It also asks for people to support its online petition calling for a ban on ECT.
About CCHR: CCHR was founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and the late Dr. Thomas Szasz, Professor of Psychiatry. It has helped achieve over 190 laws to protect the rights of patients in the mental health state, including the prohibition of dangerous psychiatric treatments, including criminal penalties if administered, and stringent informed consent provisions.
[1] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[2] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[3] www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/26/2018-27809/neurological-devices-reclassification-of-electroconvulsive-therapy-devices-effective-date-of, under Response 23, "Response" 4; § 882.5940 Electroconvulsive therapy device, (J)
[4] www.cchrint.org/2023/11/03/patients-given-electroshock-brain-damage-recourse/
[5] www.cchrint.org/2023/09/18/who-guideline-condemns-coercive-psychiatric-practices/ citing www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/WHO-OHCHR-Mental-health-human-rights-and-legislation_web.pdf
[6] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[7] www.mentalhealthtoday.co.uk/news/in-our-right-mind/exclusive-crisis-care-faces-legal-fall-out-after-nhs-digital-lose-control-of-non-consensual-ect-data
[8] jaapl.org/content/51/1/47; www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf; www.cchrint.org/memorandum-need-for-human-rights-in-mental-health-laws/
[9] www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf
The renewed call for a ban comes in response to the first-ever international survey of people who have undergone ECT, conducted by a team of researchers including individuals from England, Northern Ireland, and the United States. The survey is also distinctive as it simultaneously includes input from relatives and friends of ECT recipients.
The research team, consisting of five co-researchers, three of whom have personally experienced ECT, has launched a comprehensive survey.[1]
Historically, ECT research has been criticized for relying heavily on the subjective opinions of prescribing psychiatrists, leading to generally favorable outcomes. However, smaller studies in the 1980s and 1990s, which directly asked ECT patients about their experiences, revealed less favorable outcomes, including rates of permanent memory loss.[2]
While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has permitted ECT devices to remain on the market, it also cautions that "Long-term safety and effectiveness of ECT treatment has not been demonstrated."[3] In 1976, the devices were grandfathered in, and subsequently, no clinical trials have proven their safety and efficacy.
More on ncarol.com
- High-Value Execution Phase Begins: Bitcoin Bancorp Ignites Texas Rollout of Digital Asset ATM Network: Bitcoin Bancorp (Stock Symbol: BCBC) $BCBC
- UK Financial Ltd Tokenized LTNS 1, A $1.1 T Asset-Backed ERC-3643 Security Token with 11 On-Chain Contracts Verifying, Compliant Real-World Value
- SelfCare is now HealthCare across America
- Homeowner Prep Announces Strategic Language Shift: Replacing "Renters" with "Future Homeowners" to Inspire Wealth-Building Mindsets
- LiposoMore™ Redefines Bioavailability: Joyful Nutritional Launches High-Performance Liposomal Vitamin C and Iron for the Global Supplement Market
Lisa Morrison, a co-researcher based in Belfast, Ireland, expressed concern about the treatment's impact on memory, stating, "ECT has caused huge gaps in my memory. It's particularly distressing as a Mum to have lost significant memories of my children growing up…. The treatment can sometimes affect relatives too and their relationship with those receiving it. We want everybody to know their experiences matter."
CCHR played a pivotal role in securing the first legislative safeguards against ECT use, a landmark achievement dating back to the 1970s. The organization also contributed to the prohibition of electroshock therapy for minors in California and subsequently in various other states, including Texas and in Western Australia.
ECT sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure, which induces a loss of consciousness and violent muscle contractions, masked by an anesthetic.[4]
Recent guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Mental Health, Human Rights, and Legislation, also asserts that ECT can result in brain damage. This requirement is supported by information found in a manual from a U.S. electroshock device manufacturer, which confirms the occurrence of this adverse effect.[5]
The online, anonymous survey, approved by the University of East London Ethics Committee, is open to individuals worldwide who are at least 18 years old and have undergone ECT in the past, excluding the last four weeks.[6]
In the UK, it has been reported that around 40% of ECT procedures are non-consensual and performed on individuals detained against their will under the framework of the UK Mental Health Act.[7] In the United States, numerous states permit involuntary ECT, even though the United Nations Convention against Torture explicitly denounces such practices.[8]
In 2013 the UN Committee against Torture stated that when forcibly given or administered without a patient's consent, electroshock constitutes torture—a practice that needs to be outlawed.[9]
More on ncarol.com
- GDE Tree Services Expands Operations into Sydney, NSW
- Tuckwell Machinery Expands CNC Range to Support Australian Cabinet Makers
- The Inner Power of Emotional Self-Leadership
- Dr. Nadene Rose Shares the Secret to True Success: Faith, Obedience, and Divine Purpose
- Understanding Unexpected Death: Why Independent Autopsies Matter in Cases Without Clear Cause
So detrimental are its effects that CCHR produced a definitive documentary on electroshock, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock.
CCHR urges those who have undergone ECT or have close connections to ECT recipients to participate in the survey, emphasizing the importance of hearing the voices of those directly affected by this controversial treatment. It also asks for people to support its online petition calling for a ban on ECT.
About CCHR: CCHR was founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and the late Dr. Thomas Szasz, Professor of Psychiatry. It has helped achieve over 190 laws to protect the rights of patients in the mental health state, including the prohibition of dangerous psychiatric treatments, including criminal penalties if administered, and stringent informed consent provisions.
[1] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[2] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[3] www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/26/2018-27809/neurological-devices-reclassification-of-electroconvulsive-therapy-devices-effective-date-of, under Response 23, "Response" 4; § 882.5940 Electroconvulsive therapy device, (J)
[4] www.cchrint.org/2023/11/03/patients-given-electroshock-brain-damage-recourse/
[5] www.cchrint.org/2023/09/18/who-guideline-condemns-coercive-psychiatric-practices/ citing www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/WHO-OHCHR-Mental-health-human-rights-and-legislation_web.pdf
[6] www.psychologytoday.com/nz/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202401/international-survey-of-electroconvulsive-therapy
[7] www.mentalhealthtoday.co.uk/news/in-our-right-mind/exclusive-crisis-care-faces-legal-fall-out-after-nhs-digital-lose-control-of-non-consensual-ect-data
[8] jaapl.org/content/51/1/47; www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf; www.cchrint.org/memorandum-need-for-human-rights-in-mental-health-laws/
[9] www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf
Source: Citizens Commission on Human Rights
0 Comments
Latest on ncarol.com
- EFA Announces 2026 Editorial Rate Chart
- Red5 Taps PubNub to Power the Next Era of Real-Time Interactive Streaming
- Yield Curve Shifts Drive Retail Traders to AI Trading for 126% Annualized Return Stability
- Shoutout Joseph Neibich aka Nybyk
- Meet Joseph Neibich aka Joseph Nybyk of Beachwood Canyon
- LARUS Launches Business Continuity Framework for IPv4-Dependent Networks
- A Cure In Sight Advances Ocular Melanoma Advocacy During Rare Disease Week 2026 in Washington, DC
- Craigory Dunn Introduces "The Craig Nice Report," A Bold Response to the AI Music Debate
- KeysCaribbean Offers 'Skip-the-Crowds' Savings With 15 Percent Off April Stays
- New from Regal House Publishing, A Reckoning Up Black Cat Hollow, a psychological crime thriller
- Supply & Demand Chain Executive Names Puga Sankara as Recipient of 2026 Pros to Know Award
- K4Connect launches K4IQ™, an intelligence layer on FusionOS turning data into actionable insights
- Atelier 4 Appoints Museum Logistics Expert Heather Haldeman as Senior Client Advisor
- AI Disruption Meets Marine Scale: Off The Hook YS, Inc. (N Y S E American: OTH) Targets Breakout Growth with NextBoat Launch and Aggressive Expansion
- Targeting the Billion-Dollar U.S. Countermeasure Market With AI-Driven Biodefense Platform: Lunai Bioworks (N A S D A Q: LNAI)
- New Global Standard for Transparency Across Critical Resources and Energy Markets: SMX (Security Matters) PLC (N A S D A Q: SMX)
- Forced Psychiatric Hospitalization Fails Vulnerable People: CCHR Urges Repeal Amid Rising U.S. Policies
- Surging Into High-Performance AI With $AMD Partnership, Patent Expansion, and Strengthened Balance Sheet: Avalon GloboCare Corp. (N A S D A Q: ALBT)
- Kiko Nation Launches Mobile App to Modernize Livestock Management and Digital Animal Registry
- NEW MANAGEMENT BOOK: Creating a Joy-Centric Culture